Are you blind?! All my sources are linked. The article from Peter Gray is actually posted:

Screenshot of one of my earlier responses to you

Here’s what Publisher’s Weekly says about The Chalice and the Blade

From Publishers Weekly

“Women played leading roles in the first Christian communities; Jesus’ teachings had a feminist bent; ancient Hebrews worshipped the prehistoric goddess-mother well into monarchic times; and Nazis, with their system of male dominance, were a direct throwback to the Indo-European or Aryan invaders whom they crudely imitated. These controversial ideas and findings suggest the thrust of Eisler’s highly readable synthesis. She convincingly documents the global shift from egalitarian to patriarchal societies, interweaving new archeological evidence and feminist scholarship. In her scenario, as women once venerated were degraded to pawns controlled by men, social cooperation gave way to reliance on violence, hierarchy and authoritarianism. The book, despite its jargon, is an important contribution to social history. Eisler wrote The Equal Rights Handbook.”
Copyright 1987 Reed Business Information, Inc.

These are the resource links for the Wiki page on TCATB. Feel free to follow them up.

1. Eisler, R. “Human Possibilities:The Interaction of Biology and Culture”, Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies. (2014)
2. ^ Emery F. E. and Trist E. L. 1973. Toward a social ecology: Contextual appreciation of the future and the present. New York: Plenum Press.
3. ^ Textor, R. (1969). Cross cultural summary. New Haven, CT: Human Relations Area Files. Sanday, 1981; Coltrane, 1988 Coltrane, S. (March 1988). Father-child relationships and the status of women: A cross-cultural study. American Journal of Sociology, 93(5), 1060–1095.
4. ^ Benedict, R. (1946). The Chrysanthemum and the sword: Patterns of Japanese culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; Abu-Lughod, L. (1986). Veiled sentiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5. ^ For a sampling of sources for this ongoing research, see e.g. Eisler, R. 2000. Tomorrow’s Children: Partnership Education for the 21st Century; Eisler, R. & Levine, D. (2002) Nature, Nurture, and Caring: We are not Prisoners of Our Genes. Brain and Mind, Vol. 3, No 1, April; Eisler, R. (2007). The Real Wealth of Nations: Creating a Caring Economics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler; Eisler, R. (2013) Protecting the Majority of Humanity: Toward an Integrated Approach to Crimes against Present and Future Generations.” In Sustainable Development, International Criminal Justice, and Treaty Implementation. Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger and Sébastien Jodoin, editors, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.305–326.
6. ^ Mallory, J. P.(1989) In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, Archaeology and Myth. London: Thames and Hudson
7. ^ Gimbutas, M. (1982) The Goddesses and Gods of Old Europe, Berkeley: University of California Press.
8. ^ Mellaart, James. (1967) Çatal Hüyük. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9. ^ Marshack, A. (1991), The Roots of Civilization. Mount Kisco, New York: Moyer Bell Ltd.
10. ^ Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1971), Prehistoire de l’art Occidental. Paris: Edition D’ArtLucien Mazenod
11. ^ Platon, N. (1966) Crete. Geneva: Nagel Publishers
12. ^ Lerner, G. (1986). The Creation of Patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. ^ These articles are good source for understanding this controversy: Marler, J. (1999). A Response to Brian Hayden’s Article: ‘An Archaeological Evaluation of the Gimbutas Paradigm. The Pomegranate 10, Autumn, pp:37–47 and Marler, J. The Beginnings of Patriarchy in Europe: Reflections on the Kurgan Theory of Marija Gimbutas. In The Rule of Mars: The History and Impact of Patriarchy. Edited by Cristina Biaggi. Manchester, Conn.: Knowledge, Ideas, and Trends, Inc
14. ^ Marinatos, N. (1993). Minoan religion: Ritual, image, and symbol. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
15. ^ Hoddard, I. (2004). Women and Men at Catalhoyuk. Scientific American. January, pp. 77–83.
16. ^ Fry, Douglas, editor. (2013). War, Peace, and Human Nature: the Convergence of Evolutionary and Cultural Views. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. ^ Mn, J. Editor in Chief (1995). The Chalice and The Blade in Chinese Culture: Gender Relations and Social Models. The Chinese Partnership Research Group, Beijing: China Social Sciences Publishing House.

I’m done dealing with you and your nonsense. You keep grasping at straws in the most pathetic way imaginable and I don’t have any more time for it.