But the data hasn't actually been substantively disputed - the article you linked compares things that have many, many other factors in play and are not a straight scientific comparison. Unless you can demonstrate to me why the WHO (which is made up of 194 member states) would legitimize research which is faulty or erroneous, I have no reason to believe that it is anything but solid, despite the undetailed speculations of some people.

And you were the one who sai: "When the rest of the world’s countries are 20–30% circumcised on average..." You didn't say Western Europe, you said the rest of the world - and that is simply not factual. I've already stipulated to the fact that most of Western Europe does not circumsize widely.

Circumcision is currently increasing in parts of Africa, not for religious reasons, but for the scientific ones that I've already listed.

I'm speaking in my comments to your complete lack of precision in your assertions and making sure that anyone who reads this thread in the future will have access to accurate data - not just assertions that are full of hyperbole.

It's fine to be passionate about something, but it's not fine to completely misrepresent the facts when doing so.

I am under no obligation to be quiet just because you want me to. If you don't want to talk to me, then it's up to you to stop. Feel free to mute me or even block me. You have all sorts of options at your fingertips. 👋