I am shocked that you would support such blatant misandry and call it an excellent response. I spoke repeatedly in my OP about how cultural and generational expectations affect the opportunities that men have to bond with their children in the ways that they might like to. FFS, the subheading is about how patriarchy harms men. She has said that men are biologically and constituionally inclined to abandon their children - that "Perhaps, household, is not a place where a dad's soul wants to be. And by forcing himself into the confines of his domestic duties, he betrays his destiny, so to speak." and you think that is an academic insight? It's hateful and also demonstrably wrong, since millions of men would love to be more involved in the lives of their children, and millions of men already are much more involved than their fathers.