I am under no obligation to be particularly pleasant or kind to someone as hateful and creepy as that guy. He loathes women (unless they are serving his needs) and his article illustrated that - and that was in part what I was responding to. See my other recent comment to you for more details on his creepy misogyny.

He doesn't particularly care about abortion rights, because he doesn't care about human rights in general - seeing our current constructs around them as "woke" Western ideology that we foist on others. He just wanted a vehicle for spouting off about "angry white women" where he could plausibly get away with that without too much backlash, although he did get quite a bit anyhow because his theories don't hold water.

One savvy commenter said, "Its interesting that you label people fighting to stop government control over the bodies of women as "extremist". Aren't people seeking to control bodies of women the real extremist?? He didn't get a reply.

These are my thoughts exactly! Abortion rights are not a theoretical rhetorical thing to me, and I'm not going to stand around listening to hateful drivel directed at people who are literally fighting for their lives and their futures.

As Eli Wiesel so wisely said, “We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented."