I don't know why you think that these are somehow "MY" theories. That's what men who are trying to undermine by authority since I'm a women say - nice going Mr. feminist!
I quoted to you from a book that referenced literally hundreds of other scientific articles and studies -including ones about animals as well as humans. You haven't actually refuted any of them in any substantive way, and you're also going to float your own non-expertise as a rebuttal - but I'm the one who is somehow non-scientific. 🙄
And I've never denied biological differences between men and women - particularly not in the reproductive system. That would be insane. What are you even going on about? Your emotions are clouding your cognition. And despite me quoting to you from various animal experts about just how often female promiscuity is a central aspect of mating - particularly in primates - if you're still going to insist that females "aren't designed for that" I'm just going to laugh at you and throw up my hands. That was the prevailing thought in Darwin's time. Time to come into the 21st century.
“The myth of the coy and chaste female is all but shattered. We now know that in most animals females are surprisingly promiscuous. Surprising, because it has often been difficult to see the benefits of female promiscuity.”
