I find the whole concept of "high value" people of any gender to be utterly dehumanizing and out of touch with reality about what relationships are all about. It's transactional and also out of most men's ability to impact. For example, they can't change their height or in most cases, vastly improve their income. Telling them that women only want someone like that is disempowering, teaches men to blame women for not liking them (when more often, it's because they don't have the other sorts of traits that you can coach them on) and completely feeds into the dominance hierarchy beliefs that some people are more worthy than others. It's not something to aspire to because it's a toxic concept, IMO.

Much better to help give them the foundations you've described and then tell them to be themselves, and concentrate on being a good person, rather than trying to aspire to some unattainable, anachronistic, and sort of icky ideal. Maybe your concept of a high value man is more well-rounded and healthy and it sounds like it probably is - but that's not the way that term is most often used in dating vernacular, and that's where I think it's better to choose a different term to inspire the men you work with. Again, just my opinion.