I haven't changed the definition - I've simply noted what they are actually doing despite what they claim to be doing - and this stuff IS all bunk because it's based in flawed suppositions. In my OP I quoted from a mainstream article about some of the main beliefs of EP and then demonstrated - from a variety of sources - how each and every one of those beliefs is flat out wrong, and anti-scientific because none of that stuff was taking place in the Paleolithic. You didn't say that isn't what EP believes in. In fact, you didn't disavow that junk shit in any way. Something that seems rather curious to me.
This is not "my flavor of EP" - it's the only one that I have ever encountered - and it's largely junk science that is out of step with mainstream actual anthropology, primatology, and other relevant research. I did exactly what I set out to do and most readers/commenters agreed. I'm going back to my original assessment - you are blinded by your emotions on this.
