I’m having a hard time replying to this without resorting to uncivil language. Food is not mandated by the government. It is not filled with heavy metals and known neurotoxins and the health properties of food, although sometimes debated, are not at the level that requires you to go through a special court to gain redress should injuries occur. That analogy is entirely specious and disrespectful of the lives of those who have died or been injured by vaccines.

Yes, there are definite public health benefits, but why is it so outrageous to ask for better information, better, more rigorous testing, etc.? Why is it OK to sacrifice the lives of some people for the good of others without even attempting to mitigate that situation? There will probably always be some kind of trade-off, but we aren’t even trying to do better, and this is my point. This kind of Orwellian fanaticism that brooks no questioning would be amusing if it weren’t so deadly serious.