It's not the divine feminine you are dissing - it's research and expert analysis and debunking of cultural myths and I think the reason for that is because it's being done by a woman. At least that's my pervasive experience with guys like you - and yes, sorry, but you are a type - one that I encounter with regularity.
And if you're going to use terms like "mansplaining" you might want to actually know what they mean first. Mansplaining means explaining to someone in a condescending or patronizing way all about something that they actually have more direct knowledge, or greater expertise about - like the guy who went to space camp once and was explaining to a female astronaut about what the space equivalent zone was, or explaining a woman's own book that she wrote to her (how the term originated).
"But here’s what makes “mansplaining” different: When a man “mansplains” something to a woman, he interrupts or speaks over her to explain something that she already knows — indeed, something in which she may already be an expert — on the assumption that he must know more than she does. In many cases, the explanation has to do specifically with things that are unique to women — their bodies, their experiences, their lives. When men interrupt or presume to correct a woman who is speaking of her own experience or expertise, they are implying that she is ignorant, that she is incapable of having authoritative knowledge. They are saying, essentially, “Shh. I know best.”
So no, pointing out that you are just like a bunch of the other guys that I routinely encounter who behave in the exact some way that you have is not mansplaining in the least. About 55% of my 7.5k followers are male and many of them are quite interested to learn what I have to say about all this stuff. Many who are more learned than I am on these topics tell me that they agree with me and I appreciate me presenting what I do. So, it's not that only women treat me with respect it's that it's only men who don't - a certain kind of man, which I think is again related to patriarchal indoctrination. The fact that you just jumped to the conclusion that what I’m saying is some sort of feminist agenda also speaks volumes, and is also par for the course from your type of man. I quote Scientific American and the man who is the head of the Jane Goodall Center and noted (mostly male) anthropologists, but because I’ve said it, and it doesn’t fit your preconceived notions which were fed to you in order to justify the current social system, then I’m just pushing feminism? See how absurd that is?
If you're so rational, why are you being so emotional and offended? Why are you dismissing the prevailing scientific understanding of human history because you're annoyed with the messenger? What you are referring to as “mainstream” is propaganda that doesn’t hold up to scrutiny — which is my entire point. It’s why I write what I do — to point that out because I don’t like being fed lies. Clinging to that sort of “everyone knows” narrative is hardly rational. Go do your own research on this and you’ll find that the prevailing scientific understanding or our human history doesn’t align with what you term as “mainstream beliefs.”
You asserted a bunch of stuff which has no actual basis in facts, although it is a strong cultural narrative. I pointed out how and why they were wrong using citations to scientific papers and subject matter experts. I didn't say this took place because you were uneducated or an idiot. I said it took place because that's what you've been taught - and then you got all bent out of shape at me for saying that. I used to think the same way as you, but then I started actually studying and learning, and came to other conclusions which embrace current science rather than cultural narratives. If that's so offensive, next time I'll just say the other, if it'll make you happier.
