I've written maybe ten articles about just that and rather than reiterate, I'm just going to link some of them to you because honestly, I'm not sure I can keep a civil tongue at this point. Why are you once again telling me what I know and don't know about my area of expertise that by your own account, you don't actually know much about? This is the kind of absolutely offensive, condescending, horseshit that I'm pretty darn tired of. Are you going to ask questions and learn or are you going to float antagonistic "I just know" assumptions that have no basis in anything but your preconceived notions and anger at feminists? Seriously, CUT IT OUT!!!!

‘Egalitarian’ and ‘Patriarchal’ May Not Mean What You Think They Do

Are We Still Living In a Patriarchy

Human History Shows a Long Heritage of Personal Autonomy

The Trope of The Farmer’s Daughter

Edit: This is a highly simplified version, but since you probably aren’t going to read the other articles in full, here’s the short and dirty:

The social dynamics only began to change as greater personal property that came with a larger reliance on agriculture began to be a factor. Paternity is important for the first time, since no longer does the entire tribe look out for everyone’s wellbeing. Combine this with a wave of natural disasters and incursions from more warlike Proto-Indo-European tribes, and a new more stratified type of social organization arises. This included not only a gendered power differential but a whole new class system where none had existed before. The following excerpt from an article in the World Economic Forum explains quite well how this came about:

“Labor roles became more gendered as well. Generally, men did the majority of the fieldwork while women were relegated to child-rearing and household work. Without contributing food (and by association, without control over it), women became second-class citizens. Women also had babies more frequently, on average once every two years rather than once every four in hunter-gatherer societies.

Because somebody had to have control over surplus food, it became necessary to divide society into roles that supported this hierarchy. The roles of an administrator, a servant, a priest, and a soldier were invented. The soldier was especially important because agriculture was so unsustainable compared to hunting and gathering. The fickleness of agriculture ironically encouraged more migration into neighboring lands in search of more resources and warfare with neighboring groups. Capturing slaves was also important since farming was hard work, and more people were working in these new roles.

This division of labor and social inequality had very real consequences. For instance, while the majority of people had disastrous health compared to their hunter-gatherer ancestors, the skeletons of Mycenean royalty had better teeth and were three inches taller than their subjects. Chilean mummies from A.D. 1000 had a fourfold lower rate of bone lesions caused by disease than commoners.”