Most of your comments are so nitpicking as to be pointless and I honestly don't have the time to swat at flies all day - but I will respond to this one. Read the story that I linked you about women hunters. The question is not and has never been if there were cultures with more women than men hunters. Your supposition is that there were distinct gender roles and that they evolved by aptitude, and I've demonstrated how that isn't really true because women hunters were common and still are today in many hunter/gatherer cultures - including big game hunters.
Amongst some First Nations peoples it is the men who traditionally do the weaving. In others, it's the women. So, no, inherent aptitude by gender doesn't figure in. You're grasping at straws. In Egypt prior to 4k BC, women conducted most of the business in the marketplace, including legal business, while men stayed home and did the weaving. Women don’t have some inherent aptitude for “textiles.” I’m just shaking my head at how little you know about the topics that you feel just fine opining about. In Medieval Europe, weaving was done by guilds of men.
In the story about the plow, which you clearly didn't bother to read, cultures that historically farmed with hoes don't have the same kind of diminishment of status for women. Farming isn't a gendered activity, only farming with a plow.
The Mosuo of China are a matrillineal culture where the women do all the farming as well as all the other heavy work (with the exception of building houses, which the men do).
The matriarchs (photographer Karolin) Klüppel met were “often very funny, and very active”, at odds with the German culture she is used to. “I saw an 80-year-old women carrying things I could no way carry myself,” she says. “Their bodies are really tense with power. I realized that physical strength really depends on what you do with your body — the women have more strength than the men!”
National Geographic
Subjugation of women by men is the central theme of the past 5 thousand years (when patriarchy as a social system first arose) - which is mercifully only a small fraction of human history - something that I don't need to "defend" in any material way because it's historically self-evident.
The premise of the OP is that men are "hardwired" to be providers - something that I've already thoroughly debunked.
If I come across as condescending, it’s because your responses are so uneducated, so filled with bias, and so lame. When I eviscerate your absurd theories, you simply claim that wasn’t your point. Honestly, it makes my head hurt to deal with this nonsense, so I’m on to other things.
