NO! It most decidedly did not. The onset of patriarchy brought chaos, it did not address it.
But by the fifth millennium B.C.E., or about seven thousand years ago, we begin to find evidence of what Mellaart calls a pattern of disruption of the old Neolithic cultures in the Near East.5 Archaeological remains indicate clear signs of stress by this time in many territories. There is evidence of invasions, natural catastrophes, and sometimes both, causing large-scale destruction and dislocation. In many areas the old painted pottery traditions disappear. Bit by devastating bit, a period of cultural regression and stagnation sets in. Finally, during this time of mounting chaos the development of civilization comes to a standstill.
Eisler, Riane. The Chalice and the Blade (p. 84). HarperCollins. Kindle Edition.
This glorification of the lethal power of the sharp blade accompanied a way of life in which the organized slaughter of other human beings, along with the destruction and looting of their property and the subjugation and exploitation of their persons, appears to have been normal. Judging from the archaeological evidence, the beginnings of slavery (the ownership of one human being by another) seem to be closely linked to these armed invasions (that brought the onset of patriarchy).
Eisler, Riane. The Chalice and the Blade (p. 92). HarperCollins. Kindle Edition.
Patriarchy spread because it was so disruptive that it drove migration. There was plenty of order and civilization before it came along.
