The benefits are not minimal. "Clinical trials, many done in sub-Saharan Africa, have demonstrated that circumcision reduces HIV infection risk by 50 percent to 60 percent, the CDC guidelines note. The procedure also reduces by 30 percent the risk of contracting herpes and human papilloma virus (HPV), two pathogens believed to cause cancer of the penis."

50% less chance of contracting HIV is not not minimal, and neither is 30% less chance of HPV.

You seem to be wanting to engage in a largely one-sided argument. I'm not advocating for circumcision. I'm simply stating facts which I believe are a relevant part of the decision - ones which you keep dismissing without even knowing what they are based on how you assume it is.