What? The level of cognitive dissonance is truly stunning!

You said more women are going into non-physical "tech" work and that this, in fact, has led to "female empowerment" somehow. I provide you with statistics and quotes from various sources indicating that aside from the fact that women have always worked in very physically demanding fields when they are allowed to, more and more women are actually going into the trades than ever before.

How exactly do you reconcile the statement "If they (women) are presented with a choice, they will pick a less physically demanding job." with the fact that more and more women are going into the trades and other highly physical work such as mining? According to you, there's more and more tech jobs available to them, and yet, the numbers of women in the trades has increased by over a third in just the past 5 years. Clearly, they do have choices and a certain significant percentage of women are actually choosing the more physically demanding work.

Everything you've said is clearly and demonstrably wrong. It doesn't align with history, facts, or anything else based in reality.

🤦‍♀️