Whether or not pheromones exist for human mating (something that most scientists find debatable) is unrelated to all the other concrete and very specific assertions of evolutionary psychology that I have debunked with known scientific facts. For example, human males are not "narturally" randy and promiscuous in a way that females aren't, and it's just plain silly to claim that - particularly when the main "evidence" of this is a non-replicable and methodologically unsound study from the 1940s on FRUIT FLIES and the social mores of Victorian England.

Give it a rest already.