Yes it is - and I provided a mathematical model to support it (as well as the mathematical calculations of scientists who have studied this) about how it doesn't work today and how it couldn't have possibly worked a million years ago either - because when the population of the whole world was just a couple hundred thousand people, most men never met 100 women in their lifetime, much less in a month. It's not an untestable claim. It's patently obvious from looking at real life conditions and historical fact.

In addition, things like Bateman's fruit fly study, which have long been viewed as proving this hypothesis about male promiscuity and female choosiness have been shown to be scientifically unsound using poor methodology and leaping to conclusions not supported by any data.

Honestly, give it a rest ... You don't actually care about this topic, you care about showing me how wrong I am (for some bizarre reason). The problem is, I'm not wrong and I've provided clear and logical scientific evidence to support it - something every other commenter on this story has acknowledged.

I don't have any more time to devote to this nonsense. Get a new hobby.