You have absolutely no understanding of this topic or subject matter. You're just pulling things from your "everyone knows" box which is completely unsupported by data or facts and willfully ignorning all the science that I have put in front of you, coming from a wide variety of sources and scientific subgroups. You can't even refute what I've said except with your say so. What kind of lame-ass debate is that?

You are "conjecturing" that old age and death came early to foragers but just like everything else you are assuming here, you are wrong. Yes, infant mortality was an issue, but then again it was for agriculturalists as well. For hunter-gatherers, if you made it past childhood, the chances were you'd live a lifespan equivalent to what we have now. We have archeology evidence of that.

I could cite you perhaps 50 things right now that speak to the universal understanding that the world changed dramatically with the advent of agriculture and how that affected the social dynamics, etc., but since you haven't paid any attention to the ones I've already given you, I don't imagine it would make any difference.

Your assertions are nothing short of ridiculous as is your belief in the things that you "just know." I'm not wasting any more time on you.