You have never once demonstrated that anything I've said was counterfactual or not well supported by citations. Your primary complaint has been that I didn't condense 15 years of expertise into something you could easily refute. Since nothing about your attacks on my work makes any logical sense or has any meaningful substance to it, I am left to conclude that it is psychological in nature and I can't exactly speak to that since it's not even really about me. 🤷‍♀️